Patriots and Liberty

In “The Historical Roots of ‘Political Correctness,’ author Raymond V. Raehn observed that America is “dominated by an alien system of beliefs, attitudes, and values that we have come to know as ‘Political Correctness.’ Political Correctness seeks to impose a uniformity of thought and behavior on all Americans and is therefore totalitarian in nature. Its roots lie in a version of Marxism which seeks a radical inversion of the traditional culture in order to create a social revolution.” (www.freecongress.org)

Political Correctness and Multiculturalism are a modified version of Marxism formulated by the Frankfurt School. The new version is simply Marxism translated from economic terms into cultural terms. The proletariat is no longer the working class but cultural fringe elements such as man-hating females, members of the criminal element, and the ‘sexually confused,’ known in Marxist-speak as the ‘gay subspecies.’ The correct label for this modified version is Cultural Marxism.

Behind radical feminism, same-sex marriage, the androgyny theme, gay pride, and the overall pattern of degeneration at all levels of society throughout America and the West lies a revamped international Communist revolution. Being anti-Stalinist it shuns the Communist label and instead disguises itself as Multiculturalism and Political Correctness. Separation of church and state, pornography, easy divorce, open borders, extreme sex education, abortion, gay pride, same-sex marriage, androgyny, political correctness, speech codes, the wreckage of the traditional family, and hate crime laws—all were imported to the Christian West from the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union. We did not recognize it as Communism because we believed Stalin’s modified version to be the original communism.

Pre-Stalinist Soviet Union

In analyzing Marxism, historian Arnold Toynbee revealed that it is a distinctly ’religious’ secular humanist inspiration whose God is the Goddess of Historical Necessity. Marxism, states Toynbee, “is the apocalyptic vision of a violent revolution which is inevitable because it is the decree…of (the Goddess), and which is to invert the present roles of Proletariat and Dominant Majority…in a reversal of roles which is to carry the Chosen People…from the lowest to the highest place in the Kingdom of this World.” (A Study of History)

In other words, the Christian culture was to be turned upside-down and the chosen ones—the proletariat and their subculture—placed into positions of dominance. The new Kingdom was to be matrist and polymorphously perverse.

In the pre-Stalinist Soviet Union, Bolshevik religious fanatics—believing they were “scientific high-priests” endowed with “God-like” creative powers—literally attempted to scientifically re-engineer not only a New Man but a polymorphously perverse Kingdom of this World where androgynous beings could move fluidly into and out of sexually-gratifying relationships. Before they could begin this monstrously inhuman project, Marxists first had to deconstruct both man and his existing culture.

Nihilism in the Name of “Science—Amen!”

The first order of business was to ‘exorcise’ God, Creator of the universe. This they attempted to do by declaring a ‘separation of church and state.’ “The Bolsheviks took power in 1917 and declared a separation of church and state. Thus the Russian Orthodox Church found itself without official state backing for the first time in its history.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Orthodox_Church)

Abolishing the ‘oppressive’ traditional family came next. Toward this end, universal moral law was tossed aside, wives and mothers were forced into factories, abortions made free, and divorces attained within minutes. Catastrophe ensued: “When the Bolsheviki came into power in 1917, they regarded the family…with fierce hatred and set out…to destroy it. One must live in Russia today, amid the atmosphere of torment, disgust, and disillusionment that pervades sex relations, the chaos, uncertainty, and tragedy that hover over the Russian family…Some men have twenty wives, living a week with one, a month with another…Abortions cover our villages with shame. Formerly we did not even hear of them.” (The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage, by a Woman Resident in Russia; Atlantic Monthly, Vol.138, No.1, pp 108-114, July 1926).

Bolsheviks ‘liberated’ thousands upon thousands of hapless children from their ‘oppressive’ families. Taking control of schools, they filled the heads of children with worthless propaganda and perverse ‘sex education.’ Additionally, they told them God is dead and they had evolved from fish. Children were psychologically (spiritually) manipulated into not only turning against their own families, but into spying upon them as well. The consequences of this evil were enormous. Families and culture were devastated; children’s lives were destroyed as the became child rapists, murderers, thieves, bullies, and outright sociopaths.

‘Equality’ (sameness) was created between “natural intercourse” and the paraphilias, including sodomy. “Concerning…sodomy, and various other forms of sexual gratification, which are set down in European legislation as offenses against public morality—Soviet legislation treats these the same as so-called ‘natural intercourse.” (Soviet Union in the 1920s: Scientific, Not Utopian” www.workers.org)

Like falling dominoes, the collapsing family led to the fall of social order, culture, and then the economy, unleashing a tidal wave of crime, corruption, sexual debauchery, and chaos. When Stalin came to power, he took immediate steps to restore order. The family and ethics were restored, abortion and divorce made difficult to obtain, and sodomy, gender-bendering, etc. were re-criminalized. In taking these steps, Stalin destroyed the Bolshevik’s ‘revolution,’ for which they hate him to this day.

Return of the Bolsheviks

A revitalized Bolshevik Left reorganized itself in the 1960s. To distinguish itself from the Stalinist version of Communism, it dubbed itself the New Left.

By the late 1960’s, the New Left’s Gramscian-style cultural revolution had begun in earnest in both America and the West. Disguising malignant intent behind code words such as multiculturalism, diversity, tolerance, safe schools/safe sex, same-sex marriage, ‘gay’ rights, choice, and peace, New Left revolutionaries began taking America and the West down the path to familial and cultural suicide. Partnered to their campaign of nihilism has been a relentlessly brutal assault on Christians, Orthodox Jews, conservatives, the military, and straight males (particularly white males) in which all are marginalized, psychologically bullied and targeted as ‘homophobes, bigots, racists, fascists, intolerant, divisive, and mentally ill,” or in other words, “Enemies of the People.”

With the support of big money transnational progressive foundations and individuals like George Soros, and in cooperation with Leftist media, the UN and radical non-governmental organizations, the New Left has successfully taken their aggressive ‘social engineering’ revolution worldwide and is forcing the traditional family to the brink of destruction. Now they seek to push it over the edge with the ‘same-sex marriage’ scheme. Additionally, children are slowly but surely coming under control of the ‘global village’ and being atheitized and sexualized while parents are increasingly marginalized and terrorized. From behind the barricades of the phony ‘separation of church and state’ clause, Cultural Marxists are erasing the Christian heritage of America and the West while simultaneously engaging in a brutal psychological assault against Christians and Orthodox Jews. Harnessed to these crusades is one designed to create ‘sameness’ between natural intercourse and all varieties of sexual gratification. This scheme goes by the name, ‘gay rights.’ And because all of the preceding is naturally abhorrent to people, draconian hate crime laws and speech codes are being legislated to enforce conformity and compliance.

The New Left’s global revolution comes to light in the following examples:

1. England: Don’t Abuse Gay Rights: In May last year, an Oxford student jokingly asked a police officer: Do you realize your horse is gay? Two squad cars arrived, the student was arrested and kept overnight in a police cell.” (www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk, 12/18/06) Note: see UK’s Sexual Orientation Regulations here: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20031661.htm )
2. UN NGO: IGLHRC (International Gay, Lesbian Human Rights Commission) Calls the US Marriage Amendment an International Human Rights Violation (www.iglhrc.org/ 6/5/06)
3. USA (Extreme Sex Educators): “Time Magazine, School Event Expose Massive Cultural Campaign to Promote Homosexuality to Children”…”We’re gonna win,” says (GLSEN founder Kevin) Jennings, “because of what’s happening in high schools right now.” (www.cwfa.org/ 10/7/05)
4. Northern Ireland: Lawyers Christian Fellowship to Rally against Sexual Orientation Regulations, “The government (widely criticized for) using…direct rule powers to fast-track (sexual orientation regulations). (www.ChristianToday.com/ 12/23/06)
5. London: Homophobia Spies in the Classroom, “Schools that fail to show enthusiasm in rooting out prejudice against homosexuals should be reported to police.” (www.thisislondon.co.uk/ 12/28/06)
6. England: January’s ‘The Pink News’ celebrates a good month for combating homophobia incitement with the conviction of Tory councilor Peter Willow and the Advertising Standard Authority’s investigation into an anti-gay Christian ad…The…litmus test for free speech is seeing if the vocabulary would work universally.” (www.pinknews.co.uk/ 12/27/06)
7. Germany: “Germany Uses Nazi Era Law to Imprison Mom for Homeschooling; Family Flees to Austria” (www.lifesite.net/ 9/14/06)
8. USA: “Hate-Crime Legislation Reappears” (www.citizenlink.org/ 1/16/07)
9. USA: “Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization”…In May, 2003, the American Psychiatric Assoc. met…to debate removing such paraphilias as pedophilia, transvestism, fetishism, voyeurism, and sadomasochism from the DSM (www.traditionalvalues.org)
10. USA: ‘California Psychiatrist Wants ‘Extreme Bias’ against Homosexuality Added to DSM” (NARTH, 1/6/06)

Both Orthodox-Christian Russia and Poland suffered catastrophically, first at the hands of Bolshevik fanatics and then later, under Stalin. Yet none of that matters to Cultural Marxist New Left sociopaths, for they have returned for ‘round two.’

1. Poland: “Official Homophobia Threatens Basic Freedoms, “Poland’s leaders have stoked the fires of homophobic hatred to advance their political careers,” said Scott Long, director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. (Human Rights Watch, 5/5/06)
2. Russia: “Mayor Luzhkov of Moscow Violates European Convention on Human Rights by Banning First Gay Pride Parade on May 27” (www.iglhrc.org/ 5/23/06)

Through utilization of a protracted stealth campaign to impose Cultural Marxism on America and the West, the New Left has succeeded in inverting our social, cultural, political, and moral order. As a result, we now exist in an Orwellian ‘upside-down’ world where, as evil subterranean forces work tirelessly to subvert and pervert our children, abolish marriage, abort our future citizens (babies), throw open our borders, undermine our laws and in short, to utterly destroy our civilization, the source of evil brazenly accuses the defenders of ‘home and hearth’ of being “intolerant, bigoted, sexist, racist, fascist, homophobic, and insane.” This is like a sociopath accusing the morally upright man of being a sociopath.

The French philosopher and former Marxist, Bernard-Henri Levi astutely observed, “Apply Marxism in any country you want, you will always find a Gulag in the end.”

In league with transnational progressives, New Left fanatics are stealthily lowering the “iron curtain” upon the New Soviet Union—America and the West. Political activism by conservatives, Christians, and all traditional-values patriots is no longer just a civic and moral duty. It’s now a matter of our very survival.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007
http://patriotsandliberty.com/

About Linda: Linda is the author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Related Articles:
America’s Second Civil War
Bolshevik’s ‘Gay Pride’ Disaster and its Lesson for America
The New Left, Cultural Marxism, and Psychopolitics Disguised as Multiculturalism
Trotsky’s Permanent Revolution in America
Marxist Subversion and Perversion of America’s Youth
.

For over eighty-five years, America has been incrementally conquered by the same madness-inducing demon of hatred and violence that earlier took over Russia, China, Germany, and Italy. Rabbi Aryeh Spiro concurs, “There is a madness in today’s liberal thinking. It insists on policies that tie our
hands to defend ourselves while given free reign to the jihadists intent on killing us. It is dangerous because it is becoming the law, and thinking of the land in the western world. (Liberal Madness is Deadly, www.caucusforamerica.com (1/24/08)

This demon is embodied in “enlightened” Liberals and the West’s transnational “elite,” both of which are deeply infected by materialistic Communism (Cultural Marxism) and the delusion that the true enemy of America is always on the Right. Having rejected God and the religious heritage of our civilization, they embrace instead a new order of beliefs of which Communism and Socialism are logical expressions. A new world order is what they seek, but in order that it can emerge, the existing culture must be completely destroyed.

And what is Communism? Using the former Soviet Union as an example, Frank Meyers describes it as, “The state form taken by a materialist faith determined to rule the world.” Communism or scientific materialism is “the final synthesis of all heretical tendencies that have pervaded Western civilization for many centuries.” It is materialist scientism, of which, “Communism is the culminating hubris of the Promethean man who reaches out for the world and means to remake creation. It is scientism gone political.” (The Conservative Intellectual Movement, pp. 251-252)

We are All Materialists Now

“An age of science is necessarily an age of materialism,” declared Hugh Elliot early last century, “Ours is a scientific age, and it may be said with truth that we are all materialists now.” (Darwin Day in America, John G. West, xiv)

Materialist faith, or scientific materialism, has virtually displaced America’s founding Judeo-Christian worldview with the result that materialism is now the operative assumption for much of our government, culture, politics, law, etc. Materialist operatives now control every public institution in the United States. According to the inner logic of materialist faith, “we the people” are nothing but socially-constructed atomized robots which can presumably be deconstructed and melted into an atomized mass. Toward both this goal and to raise up an army of street thugs who will destroy our culture, materialist change-agents use our education system to subvert and convert the minds of our youth. Should they succeed in thoroughly corrupting them and in turning their hearts to hate, this generation of children may become the next Khmer Rouge, who at Pol Pot’s order murdered nearly two-million people, including their own families.

What is Materialism?

As Robert Jastrow (b. 1925), recipient of NASA’s Medal for Exceptional Studies explains, there are only two possible explanations for the origin of life: evolution and creation.
“…science has no…answer to the question of the origin of life on earth. Perhaps (life) is a miracle. Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but their choices are limited: either life was created…by the will of a being outside…scientific understanding, or it evolved…spontaneously through chemical reactions…in nonliving matter…The first theory…is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science. The second theory is also an act of faith (which assumes) that the scientific view…is correct, without having concrete evidence to support that belief.” (Until the Sun Dies, Jastrow, 1977, pp. 62-63)

America is founded on the Judeo-Christian creation model. Materialist faith rises or falls on the assumptions of metaphysical materialism and evolution.
Materialism belongs to the family of Naturalism, which refers to the view that nature (or matter) is the Ultimate Substance of which the universe and all life are made, thus “all is one.” C. S. Lewis describes naturalism as a box with its top sealed tightly closed in order to keep out God and the supernatural realm. The ancient Ionians, Babylonians, Egyptians, and Aztecs were, for example, naturalists. In this view there is but one realm (the material or natural) as opposed to Judeo-Christianity’s creation model with its two interacting realms: natural and supernatural.

There are two basic kinds of Naturalism: materialism (i.e., Communism) and pantheism (i.e., Nazism and New Age Spiritual Communism). The two kinds differ chiefly about whether the First Cause or Absolute Substance is nonliving, non-intelligence bearing matter or an unknowing, unknowable, amoral mind. However, both kinds are united by their rejection of the transcendent, personal God and the supernatural realm and by their acceptance of some form of evolution, which serves as an impersonal, mechanical process of development.

Birth of Scientific Materialism: A Brief Historical Overview

As will be shown by the following overview, scientific materialism is not founded on empirical science, as has been its deceptive claim, but rather on metaphysics.
In the main, modern materialism originated in the metaphysics of the ancient Ionians and Stoics during the sixth century BC. However, it was the Atomists (Leucippus/Democritus, 460-357 BC; Epicurus, 342-270 BC; and Lucretius, 96-55 BC) who methodically developed materialism.

Forged in a furnace of narcissism, envy, and contempt, Atomism was from its inception an antihuman abomination which in later years, would attract those who enjoy the control and domination of others. Atomism set all things in ceaseless, purposeless motion by reducing everything—including man, his soul, and even his thoughts—to mindless atoms perpetually colliding with each other in a void. Man was reduced to a soulless, mindless machine that could only ‘see’ a tree because the tree emitted atoms which entered machine-man’s eyes and implanted themselves onto his brain. This view has changed very little:
“We are descended from robots, and composed of robots…” –Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds

Plato and Aristotle were the most forceful and compelling critics of Atomism. In Book X of Laws, Plato indicts the Atomists for reversing the natural order, which they did by placing dead matter before Nous (mind/soul), and for the reductionism that sets everything in motion and reduces man to a machine. Plato foresees only misery, social disintegration and ultimately, “the ruin of both states and families” should Atomism become the accepted view.

Though Christianity reared a mighty barrier against Atomism, it would be resurrected— along with the hylozoism of the Ionians and Stoics—during the Renaissance by among others, pantheist Giordano Bruno and the heretic Paracelsus, an alchemist described by C.S. Lewis as a magician in his book, The Abolition of Man.

Hylozoism (Greek hyle=nature; zoe-life) is the doctrine according to which all of nature’s bodies (i.e., sun, earth, moon, trees, man) possess life, mind, soul, and even divinity. By infusing Atomism with Ionian hylozoism, what might be called materialzoism was invented by Bruno, Paracelsus, and others. In short, dead matter was not just brought to life but deified.

The Franco-Germanic Enlightenment

With “God dead” and the source of man’s humanity (mind/soul) expropriated by materialists and conferred upon “dead matter,” a rush to discover the key that unlocks the mystery to life and mind was ignited which in later years unleashed unspeakable evil. For in believing that without a doubt, they now possessed the gnosis (secret knowledge) to not only design a utopia but create a New Man with a reprogrammed mind and conscience, Nazi and Soviet scientists performed sadistic experiments on living human beings. It was of these later scientific materialists that C.S. Lewis wrote his book, “The Abolition of Man.” Even now, wrote Lewis, the process to “abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats (and) Fascists.” The methods, said Lewis, may at first differ in brutality. But “enlightened” materialists from scientists to philosophers to academe and to political leaders mean, in the long run, “Just the same as the Nazis…” The West and America are to be destroyed and “mankind to be cut out in some fresh shape at the will” of scientific materialists who Lewis calls the Conditioners and Innovators. These people, noted Lewis, are no longer men, for they have stepped out into the void.

Among the horde of Prometheans who set out to discover the animating-power of machine-man was Giovanni Aldini, who performed macabre experiments on decapitated oxes, horses, lambs, and—once he had overcome his repugnance, on humans. For his experiments, he procured the freshest specimens possible by placing himself “under the scaffold, near the axe of justice…” Believing that some type of electricity was the source of machine-mans animation, Aldini applied electricity to various parts of decapitated human heads. This produced “the most horrid grimaces (but the) action of the eyelids was exceedingly striking.” Aldini rationalized his repugnant experiments by saying that only the “unenlightened part of mankind (will be) apt to entertain a prejudice…” (Darwin Day in America, p. 15)

Yet more power-crazed Prometheans emerged. Julien de la Mettrie (1709-51), Paul Henri Thiery, and Baron D’Holbach (1723-89) all agreed that the mind is the property of dead matter and man nothing but a machine. La Mettrie speculated that machine-mans rational life is entirely determined by physical causes that run the gamut from raw meat, to climate, blood circulation, and gender. Genetic inheritance, posits la Mettrie, causes machine-man to commit crime. This view casts parents into the role of “first cause” and would later manifest itself in the belief that State ‘experts,’ or Hillary’s “village” experts should have control of children. (ibid, pp. 16-18)

Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) viewed scientific materialism as not only the pursuit of God-like omniscience but of the Holy Grail itself—power to create a New Man. If an intelligence could grasp “at a given instant…all the forces by which nature is animated” proclaimed Laplace, it could devise a mathematical formula that would predict everything that would ever happen, and “nothing would be uncertain, and the future, like the past, would be open to its eyes.” Scientists should reduce everything in the universe to mechanical laws that could be expressed in terms of mathematics, advised Laplace, for the promise of such knowledge was incredible power…even over life and mind itself. (ibid, p. 20)

Herbert Spencer, Fechner, Lotze, Wundt, and pantheist Ernst Haeckel, inventer of the scientism dictum—ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny—all agreed that life and mind are properties of dead matter. Haeckel moreover imagined ether to be the primitive life-making substance which, as was the case with the primitive fire of the Stoics, changed one part of itself into inert mass while the other part became the active principle, spirit. Today, many scientists routinely resort to Haeckel’s postulate without ever inquiring into its pantheist implications.

Haeckel would later write, “Pantheism teaches that God and the world are one…pantheism is…an advanced conception of nature (and) a polite form of atheism.” The truth of pantheism, confessed Haeckel, “lies in its destruction of the dualist antithesis of God…” The godless world system being constructed, said Haeckel, “substantially agrees with the monism or pantheism of the modern scientist.” (Monism, Ernst Haeckel, www.pantheist.net/)

During the century to follow, Charles Darwin (1809-82) would help spread materialism to the masses. As Stephen Jay Gould argues, “Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature, “and “the ground of all existence; mind, spirit, and God (are reduced to) neural complexity.” (ibid, p. 41)

According to Darwin, natural selection and the laws of heredity acting on matter produced mind, morality, and civilization. By describing how deified natural mechanisms caused the complexity of life to emerge from deified matter, Darwin helped transform materialism from a fantastically bizarre tale told by power-mad Prometheans on the fringe of society to a hallowed scientism principle enshrined and worshipped by modern scientism and ‘enlightened’ Westerners.

It was during this time that Social Darwinism, Progressivism, Socialism, Communism (Cultural Marxism, New Left), Nazism, and Secular Humanism were developed out of metaphysical materialism. Classical Liberalism on the other hand, was subverted and corrupted by the materialist faith into what is now known as modern Liberalism. Of these, Communism (Marx and Engel’s dialectical materialism), is considered to be the most highly developed philosophy of materialism. It rests on three fundamental metaphysical presuppositions:

1.Deified Matter: The Ultimate Substance which, though non-living, non-intelligent, and non-conscious, nevertheless somehow possesses the emergent properties of life, mind, consciousness, and soul.

2.Evolution: Since Marxist dialectic requires a theory with clashes (thesis and antithesis) and leaps (synthesis), Marxists have all but abandoned Darwinism and instead have embraced punctuated equilibrium. “Many people confound dialectic with the theory of evolution,” noted G. Plekhanov. ”Dialectic is, in fact, a theory of evolution. But it differs profoundly from the vulgar (Darwinian) theory of evolution.” (Fundamental Problems of Marxism, 1929, p. 145)

3.Spontaneous Generation: An offshoot of specifically Darwinian thought accepted unreservedly by Marxists as their dialectic requires a strictly materialist explanation for the origin of life from dead matter. In the words of M.A. Leonov: “Marxist philosophical materialism remains beyond all doubt that at some time or other in the remote past, life must have arisen from non-living matter.” (Outline of Dialectical Materialism, 1948, p. 494)

In a modified version of the Stoic conception of the earth as a living organism possessed of its own soul, neo-pantheist dialectical materialism declares that earth is “one entire organism…its organs the various races and nations of men.” Not only is the earth alive and evolving upward on evolution’s magical escalator, but so too are history and society, for they also are living entities in a continuous state of motion. And man? In a modified conception of Atomism’s extremely dehumanizing view of man, dialectical materialism states that man is nothing but “a colonial aggregation of cells,” and to “consider him an individual would be an error.” Man—the aggregate of cells— is nothing but an extension of society, history, and earth. (Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics, Chapter II: The Constitution of Man as a Political Organism)

Death of America?

Modern materialist states began by rejecting God and denying objective standards of right and wrong. They threw out sanctity of life and demonically reduced man to matter in motion. The end case, in every instance, was to place absolute power over “atomized masses” into the hands of psychopaths and autocratic states to be wielded without restraint or mercy.

Of all religions, the materialist faith has been by far the bloodiest. In his book, Death by Government, R.J. Rummel comprehensively details the roughly 170 million people murdered by materialist governments during the 20th century. From 1917 to its collapse in 1991, the Soviet Union liquidated about 62 million. During Mao Tse-tung’s reign, 35,236,000 were murdered. Hitler’s Nazi’s killed 21 million. Even at its mildest, as is thus far the case here in America, there is a steady level of confiscation, corruption, fraud, and stifling of freedoms and free speech. For the first time ever, Americans are afraid of saying certain words. Parents fear disciplining their own children. More ominously, materialists in control of America (i.e., ACLU, activist judges) have rejected God and thrown out both sanctity of life and objective standards. “We the people” have been reduced to atomized beings. Totalitarianism and genocide loom just over our horizon.

As early as 1926, President Calvin Coolidge was aware of and deeply concerned by the insidious spread scientific materialism in America. As he knew, Americans are free only because of the Judeo-Christian foundation laid by the country’s founders. In a speech he delivered in Philadelphia, July 5, 1926 to commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Coolidge tried to call American’s back to their Judeo-Christian heritage. He told Americans that the Declaration’s principles of liberty arise from man’s God-given inalienable rights. And these are found, said Coolidge, “in the texts, the sermons, and the writings of the early colonial clergy…” The clergy preached equality “because they believed in the fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man.” Sanctity of life, the right to self-defense, and all the rest of our individual liberties were justified “by the text that we are all created in the divine image, all partakers of the divine spirit.” God’s children therefore, have no “superiors;” there are no modern-day “divine rights kings” who possess “any right to rule…over them.” Americans are free to choose their own leaders.

The Declaration, continued Coolidge, is “a great spiritual document.” Its principles are not material but spiritual. “Equality, liberty, popular sovereignty, the rights of man—these are not elements we can see and touch. They are ideals (whose) source and roots (are) in religious convictions. They belong to the unseen world.”

President Coolidge cautioned Americans that, “unless the faith of the Americans in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration will perish. We can not continue to enjoy the result if we abandon the cause.”

Coolidge ended his speech with a stark warning, “We must not sink into a pagan materialism…” (Back Fired, William Federer, pp. 269-271)

Yet, believing they are “enlightened” and “scientific,” maddened Liberals and Transnational “elites” are leading America over the Gadarene Cliff.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2008 PatriotsandLiberty.com/ http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Additional Sources:
Red Sea of Academe? Walter Williams, Washington Times, 8/28/06
Materialism, newadvent.org/
Hylozoism, newadvent.org/
Linda is the author of numerous published essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her writings are published both nationally and internationally. Linda is a member of the MoveOff organization and a New Media Alliance member.

The murderous secular humanist religions of Communism and Nazism were spawned by the anti-God/utopian tradition of Revolutionary France. The Black Book of Communism, an 800-page compendium of the crimes of Communist regimes worldwide, graphically details the terror, torture, man-made famine, mass deportations, starvation, and massacres undertaken on behalf of revolutionary utopian ideals. The reality of Communism, which claimed to be an emissary of the Enlightenment, of universal brotherhood, and of happiness for all as envisioned by Gracchus Babeuf, turned out to be not only a sadistic engine for unimaginable evil but also the creator of hells on earth.

The book’s authors point to Communism’s “biological and zoological strain of thinking” as the engine of evil that proved itself to be a most effective means of denying the humanity of Communism’s millions of victims. “This strain of thinking,” explained Stephane Courtois, “is why so many of the crimes of Communism were crimes against humanity, and how Marxist-Leninist ideology managed to justify these crimes to its followers.” (The Black Book of Communism; p. 751)

Biocentrism: the Biological/Zoological Strain of Thinking

Biocentrism or ecocentrism, terms synonymous with today’s sustainable development/global warming crowd, is the “biological and zoological strain of thinking” in disguise. Biocentrism is antithetical to America’s Judeo-Christian worldview in that it not only reduces man to a soulless ape, but makes his life less valuable than cockroaches, earthworms, spotted owls, trash fish, grizzlies, alligators, and wolves. Those who trace the genesis of ideas, such as Donald Worster, point to Charles Darwin as the most important spokesman for the biocentrism attitude. In short, Darwin’s theory of evolution, the malignant heart of biocentrism, leads to contempt and even hatred towards humanity.

“Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”
(Earth First! Journal editor, John Daily)

“To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem.”
(Yale professor Lamont Cole)

Biocentrism and its morally-warped system of philosophy and morality thrive right here in America. Communism (multiculturalism/Cultural Marxism) and its diabolical mother, Secular Humanism, plus its twisted sisters, Postmodernism and Cosmic Humanism (New Age global warming crowd) are now the predominant way of thinking in most of America’s power centers. At the heart of each of these systems beats the black heart of Darwinian biocentrism.

Dr. James Dobson notes, “The Secular Humanist system…has outstripped Judeo-Christian precepts in the universities…judiciary…federal bureaucracy, in business, medicine, law, psychology, sociology…arts, in many public schools, and to be sure, in the halls of Congress.” (Understanding the Times; David A. Noebel; p. 7)

Every day in our public schools, America’s children are ‘animalized’ through the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary propaganda. Though some are able to resist this dehumanizing spiritual attack, many more are not. Of those who cannot, some will go on to join the ranks of anti-God, anti-America, anti-human revolutionaries, thereby becoming accomplices in the destruction of the nation that nourishes and protects them. Others will become practical atheists who, having no faith in God, will not fight for a nation founded on Judeo-Christian precepts. From a secular humanist point of view, these are desired outcomes because:

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States.”
….Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

These things are occurring because for nearly two centuries Secular Humanists and revolutionary fellow travelers—having infiltrated and taken control of this nation’s education establishment— incrementally replaced our nation’s founding Judeo-Christian moral and philosophical worldview and history with a revolutionary catechism. The effect of this has been to not only undermine and delegitimize our nation’s traditional ideas and institutions but to also reverse and upend the natural order, all of which is leading to the destruction of our civilization.

“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.”
…Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Teaching to this nation’s future leaders, jurists, lawmakers, government workers, teachers, etc., the ideas and philosophies of men and women such as Comte, Marx, Malthus, de Sade, Rousseau, Reich, Freud, Darwin, Nietzsche, Lenin, Stalin, Heidegger, Adorno, Lukacs, Gramsci, Sanger, Marcuse, Dewey, Kinsey, Derrida, and Foucault, for example, has unleashed a devastating wave of corruption, debauchery, political correctness, chaos, pathologies, crime, narcissism, raw power-grabbing, and abandonment of allegiance towards these United States of America, all of which paves the way for the rise of a socialistic, sustainably-developed New World Order.

An alternative power structure necessary for deconstructing our Constitutional Republic has been created. This ‘shadow government’ of interlocking relationships and mutually reinforcing agendas consists of, for example, the New Left, the Democratic machine, environmental organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Audubon Society, and The Wildlife Federation; big money foundations, such as Heinz, Mott, Blue Moon, Turner, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund; federal and state fish and wildlife departments, and of course, the United Nations. In hot pursuit of their North American Union project, the power and money hungry Transnational Right aids and abets the destructive process.

With the exception of the dissident voices of “intolerant, racist/haters” like Christians and other true Conservatives, the majority of Americans have passively acquiesced to being told that they are mindless, soulless apes. They also allow their children to be animalized and even told that as apes, they share a common heritage with earthworms. In light of this, the following question bears asking: Why should anyone, let alone the narcissists who are busily deconstructing our nation, respect and serve such a people?

If Antonio Gramsci were alive, he would be gratified by how well his plan for the slow and gradual destruction of America from the inside is working.

Agenda 21: The Utopian Fantasy

Agenda 21 was adopted at the 1992 UN Conference in Rio de Janeiro. This 300-page document contains 40 chapters loaded with recommendations to micro-manage virtually every facet of human existence. Agenda 21 is not a treaty but a “soft-law” policy document that does not require Senate ratification. Some of the key players involved in its production and adoption are Al Gore, Ted Turner, and Maurice Strong. President George HW Bush signed it and President Clinton issued Executive Order No. 12852, which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development.

In his, “Sustainable Development: Transforming America,” Henry Lamb provides us with a vignette of the emerging utopia. Speaking only of America, he says:

“Half the land area of the entire country will be designated ‘wilderness areas’ where only wildlife managers and researchers will be allowed. These areas will be interconnected by ‘corridors of wilderness’ to allow migration of wildlife…Wolves will be as plentiful in Virginia and Pennsylvania as they are now in Idaho and Montana. Panthers and alligators will roam freely from the Everglades to the Okefenokee and beyond…Transportation between sustainable communities (islands of human habitation)…will be primarily by light rail systems…highways that remain will be super transport corridors, such as the “Trans-Texas Corridor” now being designed…” (Eco-logic Special Report, Dec. 1, 2005)

Property Acquisition Schemes

“The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If “Thou shalt not covet,” and “Thou shalt not steal,” were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.” …John Adams
(The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States; Charles Francis Adams, editor, Vol. VI, p.9)

The Wildlands Project, written by Dr. Reed Noss, who is under contract with The Nature Conservancy, is one such scheme. It has never been debated or voted on by elected officials. Nevertheless, it is being implemented through backdoor initiatives. Through its use thus far, 106.5 million acres have been acquire by being designated as wilderness since 1964.

Henry Lamb reports that not only is eminent domain a key ‘land-taking’ strategy but:

“In the West, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management are driving ranchers off the land by reducing grazing allotments…people who have recreational cabins on federal land, are discovering that their permits are not being renewed. The Fish and Wildlife Service is forcing people off their land through designations of “wetlands,” and “critical habitat”…” (ibid)

The biocentric Endangered Species Act makes use of spotted owls, plants, trash fish, alligators, grizzlies, wolves, and more to run people off their land. Within the space of one week last year (2006), three young Florida women were attacked by so-called ‘managed’ alligators. All three women died gruesome deaths. ‘Managed’ wolves are likewise useful for terrorizing landowners, especially when said owners have been criminally deprived of the basic right of self-defense.

An article entitled, “Wolf Management Program Actions Show Children are Expendable,” in the wolfcrossing blog speaks of the outrage, despair, and sense of helplessness felt by landowners hand-cuffed by politically correct Dept.of Fish and Wildlife regulations that elevate the welfare of wolves over that of people, thus leaving them helpless in the face of marauding wolves.

Sister Flash writes, “Recently a little boy was encircled by Mexican wolves…the Luna pack circled him for more than five minutes.” One month later, wrote Sister Flash, the pack attacked a family dog as it followed its 8-year old owner (a girl) who was going to feed the families horses. Thirty days later, “the (same) little girl’s beautiful black quarter horse (Six) was trapped in his corral and brutally slaughtered by the same wolves…(More recently) a small dog named Maggie was attacked protecting her child’s play yard, right off the front porch…” (http://wolfcrossing.org/blog/?p=235)

Not only have the wolves not been removed, but the notorious alpha male—who had been relocated from Arizona to New Mexico for hanging around a schoolyard in Blue, AZ—has been declared “no longer a threat,” by the complicit New Mexico Department of Game and Fish.

“In the beginning, God created…” is the core presupposition on which Western civilization advanced for more than two millennia. Its highest expression is in our Declaration of Independence, where it serves as the ultimate source of our unalienable rights. This presupposition is condemned by most western policy makers and by the UN, all of whom prefer the biocentric view:

“Human happiness, and…fecundity, are not as important as a wild and healthy planet…until such time as homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along.”…David Graber, research biologist with the National Park Service

“…Christianity (has set) humans apart from nature (and) converted the world into a warehouse of commodities for human enjoyment.” (Global Biodiversity Assessment, p. 787)

In a chilling portent of things to come, M. Macnab, a respondent to the wolfcrossing article, spoke to all Americans when she warned:

“We here in ‘wolf recovery territory’ know all to well what horrible encroachments on our rights can occur when state and federal officials violate their true purpose. Life without basic rights to protecting one’s family and property is not at all pleasant and this careless and lawless disregard for others welfare will, if not checked…become the standard for all.” (ibid)

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007

Linda is the author of numerous published articles on culture, worldview, and politics. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of MoveOff.org. coalition and a New Media partner.

Resources:
The Green Counter-Establishment: How It Holds Power; Bonner R. Cohen; Capital Research Center

Sustainable Development: Transforming America; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

The Importance of Morality and Religion in Government; WallBuilders.com

Al Gore, the United Nations, and the Cult of Gaia; Cliff Kinkaid; USAsurvival.org

Green Religion and Public Policy; Henry Lamb; Environmental Conservation Organization

“9th Circuit Endorses Censoring Christians,” ruling declares ‘family values,’ ‘natural family,’ and ‘marriage’ constitutes hate speech. (WorldNetDaily, 3/8/07)

“Walter Cronkite Endorses Campaign to Force Christianity Out of US Public Life,” LifeSiteNews, 2/28/07, Gudrun Schultz)

These are but two examples out of thousands that expose the Left’s brazenly relentless assault against America’s founding Christian-Judeo worldview and traditional culture. All too many Americans allow these attacks to occur because on one hand, they’ve been dumbed-down and deceived by the Leftist controlled education establishment and media, while on the other hand, they’ve been taken in by a myth.

The myth assures Americans that there was but one Enlightenment school of thought, that it is synonymous with American ideals and progress, and that religion—particularly Christianity—must be kept strictly separate from the state. Not only is all of this untrue, but these notions are invidious alien transplants to our shores.

In fact, a schism occurred among Enlightenment thinkers from which emerged two distinct and antithetical schools of thought. For ease of identification, Balint Vazsonyi refers to them in his book, “America’s 30 Years War” as the Anglo-American and the Franco-Germanic.

Genesis: Anglo-American

Among Anglo-American thinkers were, for instance, Edmund Burke, Hugo Grotius, William Blackstone, Adam Smith, Lord Acton, John Jay, and James Madison. To these thinkers, the indisputable foundations of society are man’s Creator, sanctity of life, enduring morality and virtue, family, religion, individuality, property, custom, law, community, order, freedom, prosperity, and recognition of man’s fallen nature.

Of our Founders, M. Stanton Evans reports there were forty Christians and one Deist. Of those who attended the Virginia Constitutional Convention in 1776, Evans states that only three were not vestrymen. (The Theme is Religion, p. 272)

John Adams testified to America’s Christian roots when he wrote, “The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were…the general principles of Christianity…those…principles…are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God; and those principles of liberty are as unalterable as human nature.” (Works, Vol. X, pp. 45-46, to Thomas Jefferson, June 28, 1813)

“So God created man in his own image…male and female (He) created them” Gen.1:27 (and thus man is endowed with soul, spirit, conscience, individuality, and free will)

From the Bible’s Genesis account come the all important and immutable first principles of life and liberty expressed in the Declaration of Independence thusly,
“that all people are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” The word ‘inalienable’ means ‘not from man.”

Alexander Solzhenitsyn demonstrated his understanding of the Ultimate Source of these first principles when he stated, “In American democracy at the time of its birth, all individual human rights were granted because man is God’s creature. That is, freedom was given to the individual conditionally, on the assumption of his religious responsibility.” (A World Split Apart)

The Bible teaches that man is ‘fallen’ (has a sin nature), thus the Founders understood that man is corruptible, and with power a primary source of corruption, they ingeniously structured three branches of government into which they distributed power equally. Government being seen as a necessary evil in order to secure the rights and liberties of the people, it was strictly limited in scope and size and tightly bound by the Constitution—the supreme law of the land. Man, the primary source of evil, was to be constrained by the moral disciplines of the Great Lawmaker’s universal moral laws, The Laws of Nature and Nature’s God, known in America as the Ten Commandments. Moral constraints, believed our Founders, lead to a moral citizenry, which in turn leads to a moral government. Together, these positive goods create an atmosphere in which justice, order, and maximum freedom can flourish with a minimum of government.

Less than a century after Jefferson’s death, James Bryce, an English visitor to the US said, “Christianity is in fact…though not the legally established religion, (is) yet the national religion. So far from thinking their commonwealth godless, the Americans conceive that the religious character of a government consists in…the religious belief of the individual citizens and the conformity of their conduct to that belief.” (God’s Funeral, A.N. Wilson, p. xii)

America’s Constitutional Republic—a glorious accomplishment of Anglo-American thought—is something unique in the history of the world. In America, “We the people,” empowered by man’s Creator, tell the government what it is allowed to do. For the first time ever, a system of government was built “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

Anti-Genesis: Franco-Germanic

In stark contrast to the magnificent accomplishment of Anglo-American thought stand the blight of socialism and its highly developed evil sibling, the malevolent system of Marxism. These spiritual sicknesses are the ‘greatest’ achievements of the Franco-Germanic side.

“The world has never before known a godlessness as organized, militarized, and tenaciously malevolent (evil) as that preached by Marxism. Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force.” (Alexander Solzhenitsyn quoted in “Defending the Natural Family Against the Gay Juggernaut, John A. Howard, Ph.d; The Howard Center, 3/8/06)

A major philosophical architect of the evil siblings is the amoral Prophet Jean Jacques Rousseau, a narcissist who callously used people to fulfill his self-centered needs and desires. Rousseau was described by Daniel J. Flynn as a person who was, “incapable of holding a job and sponged off women his entire life. He spawned five children, not one of whom he bothered to name, all of whom he abandoned to almost certain death at an asylum.” Jean Jacques, continued Flynn, “was a sexual pervert who enjoyed physical punishment and exposing himself to women.” It should come as no surprise, observed Flynn that Rousseau advocated, “a philosophy of sexual anarchy, state ownership of children, and the subsidization of those unwilling to work.” (Intellectual Morons, p. 33)

The axis on which Rousseau’s philosophy turns is the proposition that man is born good. In other words, and contrary to what our Founders believed and Christianity teaches, man’s nature contains no dark side, or sin nature. The primary source of evil and suffering is not man spouted Rousseau, but religion—especially Christianity— plus the concept of sin and the very pillars of society deemed ‘indispensable’ by Anglo-American thinkers.

Creating the New Man and Utopian Society

“Whoever ventures to undertake the founding of a nation should feel himself capable of changing human nature…of transforming each individual.” Rousseau, the ‘sinless demi-god’, quoted in Frederic Bastiat’s ‘Selected Essays on Political Economy, p.97

“We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing…us in the West.” Hillary Clinton aping Rousseau, quoted in “I’ve Always been a Yankee Fan, Thomas D. Kupier, p.119

Rousseau’s prescription for the salvation and redemption of mankind called for the severing of all social and familial ties and the wholesale destruction of society. “Each citizen,” he stated, “would (then) be …absolutely dependant on the State.” The State—controlled by the intellectually-superior Anointed—would serve as “the agency of emancipation that permits the individual to develop the latent germs of goodness heretofore frustrated by a hostile society.” Emancipation achieved, the “always constant, unalterable, and pure” State would then subsume individual wills into a “General Will” (‘Common Good’ in today’s leftist-speak) thereby creating not only a New Man but an Ideal Society. Moreover, posited Rousseau, since human nature is undefined (socially constructed, in Leftist-speak), not only is it infinitely moldable (it can even have 5-14 gender variants, claim intellectual morons), but there are no moral principles and Creator to limit the social-engineering ambitions of the godlike State. Should any citizens refuse to be socially re-engineered and subsumed into Divine Oneness that merely proves that they have been corrupted and therefore must be forced into conformity. True liberty, bleated Rousseau, lies in conforming to General Will and dissidents must be, “forced to be free.”

“We’re going to…take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” Hillary again aping Rousseau at fund-raiser, SFGate.com, 6/28/04

The Reign of Terror that overtook the French Revolution of 1793 was the first attempt by the Anointed to devise a New Order and a New Man. Robespierre and his Jacobin’s heeded Rousseau’s call for ‘force’ and condemned and executed all who opposed them. Over 17,000 people were executed within the year.

Among the many and ever-evolving destructive doctrines, schemes, and programs spawned thus far by Franco-Germanic notions are permanent revolution, atheism, radical feminism, secular humanism, New Humanist Man, New International Child of the future, positive law or sociological jurisprudence, collectivism, progressivism, utilitarianism, selfishness as virtue, statism, socialism, utopianism, New World Order, libertinism, queer theory, abortion, infanticide, eugenics, euthanasia, moral relativism, it takes a village, re-education camps, gulags, gas chambers, and killing fields.

Later, Karl Marx and Fredrich Engel’s wed Franco-Germanic ideas to communism, Freudian psychology, and Darwin’s theory of evolution (serving as a counterfeit genesis account) to produce the atheistic religion of Marxism. In turn, Marxism spawned nihilism, bolshevism, New Soviet Man, fascism, New Aryan Man, social Darwinism, class consciousness, the proletariat, social justice, identity politics, hate crime laws, speech codes, political correctness, the New Left, Cultural Marxism (multiculturalism), and modern liberalism (socialism in disguise). And where under Rousseau’s system man was deprived of individuality and free will and then reduced to an anonymous cog in the machinery of the General Will, he was now reduced to something less than human. Stripped of individuality, free will, soul, spirit, and conscience, he became a slightly smarter ape to whom, although he hasn’t yet realized it, the Constitution of the United States no longer applies.

“I’m going to start thinking of her as a human being.” Social Darwinist Hillary, referring to the woman who cleans the restroom she (Hillary) uses. (Peggy Noonan, discoverthenetworks.org)

Manmade Hell’s and Rivers of Blood

Historian R.J. Rummel graphically describes the hellish consequences when unbridled Power is in the hands of fallen man: “During the first eighty-eight years of this century (20th) almost 170 million men, women, and children have been shot, beaten, tortured, knifed, burned, starved, frozen, crushed or worked to death; buried alive, drowned, hung, bombed, or killed in any other of the myriad ways governments have inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners. The dead could conceivably be nearly 360 million people. It is as though our species has been devastated by a modern Black Plague. And indeed it has, but a plague of Power, not germs.” (Death by Government, p.9)

These millions died, not because of our Founders Christian-Judeo worldview, but because of the ideas generated by egocentric Franco-Germanic thinkers such as Hegel, Comte, Rousseau, Spencer, Babeuf, Darwin, Freud, Marx, and Engel’s. Ideas then acted on by great wicked ones such as Trotsky, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. The same ideas—of unbridled power, sexual anarchy, moral relativism, wrath, malevolence, violence, furious hatred, and nihilism—that have corrupted some on the Right and in the GOP and which are the dark-forces that drive the Left as it avidly anticipates seizing Absolute Control and Power over America and Americans.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn warns us that, “Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to communist policy; it is…the central pivot. To achieve its diabolical ends, communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails a destruction of faith and nationhood.” (ibid)

The antidote should be obvious. It is rededication to and revival of all that made America great in the first place, “ the indisputable foundations of society are man’s Creator, sanctity of life, family, religion ,individuality, enduring morality and virtue, property, custom, law, community, order, freedom, prosperity, and recognition of man’s fallen nature.”

Copyright Linda Kimball 2007
http://patriotsandliberty.com/

Additional Resources:
How Now Shall We Live? Colson, Pearcy
Marxism and American Society, David A. Noebel
The Worldviews of Destruction in the 20th Century, David A. Noebel
Cheers to Truth! A Collection of Hillary Compiled by discoverthenetworks.org, 2/21/07

About Linda: Linda is the author of numerous articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview which are published both nationally and internationally. She is a member of the MoveOff Network and media partners with the New Media Alliance.

There are two misconceptions held by many Americans. The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded. The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well. “The Sixties are dead,” wrote columnist George Will ("Slamming the Doors,” Newsweek, Mar. 25, 1991)

Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement. However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups. Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay’ rights groups. All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace.

Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America. They favor code words: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity. All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.

Birth of Multiculturalism

In anticipation of the revolutionary storm that would baptize the world in an inferno of red terror, leading to its rebirth as the promised land of social justice and proletarian equality-Frederich Engels wrote,

“All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm… (A general war will) wipe out all…nations, down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.” ("The Magyar Struggle,” Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849)

By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead. They wondered what had gone wrong.

Separately, two Marxist theorists-Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary-concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order. The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class. The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.” Additionally, a new proletariat must be created. In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history. All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

The Prototype

In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary. He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow, Lukacs launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.

Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

Gramsci’s prescription and Lukacs’ plans were the precursor to what Cultural Marxism in the guise of SIECUS, GSLEN, and the ACLU–acting as judicially-powered enforcers–later brought into American schools.

Building a base

In 1923, the Frankfurt School-a Marxist think-tank-was founded in Weimar Germany. Among its founders were Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodor Adorno. The school was a multidisciplinary effort which included sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revoltuion based on culture, harnessing new oppressed groups for the faithless proletariat. Smashing religion, morals, it would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression.

Toward this end, Marcuse-who favored polymorphous perversion-expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced Lukacs radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism.

Additional intellectual firepower was required: a theory to pathologize what was to be destroyed. In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno’s idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.’ This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds America’s traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist. Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists. By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America’s traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.

The pernicious influence of Adorno’s ‘authoritarian personality’ idea can be clearly seen in some of the research that gets public money.

“In Aug., 2003, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the results of their $1.2 million tax-payer funded study. It stated, essentially, that traditionalists are mentally disturbed. Scholars from the Universities of Maryland, California at Berkeley, and Stanford had determined that social conservatives…suffer from ‘mental rigidity,’ ‘dogmatism,’ and ‘uncertainty avoidance,’ together with associated indicators for mental illness.” http://www.edwatch.org/ ‘Social and Emotional Learning” Jan. 26, 2005)

The Orwellian cast of the pathologies named shows how far Gramsci’s long march has led us.

A corresponding and diabolically crafted idea is political correctness. The strong suggestion here is that in order for one not to be thought of as racist or fascist, then one must not only be nonjudgmental but must also embrace the ‘new’ moral absolutes: diversity, choice, sensitivity, sexual orientation, and tolerance. Political correctness is a Machiavellian psychological ‘command and control’ device. Its purpose is the imposition of uniformity in thought, speech, and behavior.

Critical theory is yet another psychological ‘command and control’ device. As stated by Daniel J. Flynn,

“Critical Theory, as its name implies, criticizes. What deconstruction does to literature, Critical Theory does to societies.” (Intellectual Morons, p 15-16)
Critical Theory is an ongoing and brutal assault via vicious criticism relentlessly leveled against Christians, Christmas, the Boy Scouts, Ten Commandments, our military, and all other aspects of traditional American culture and society.

Both political correctness and Critical Theory are in essence, psychological bullying. They are the psycho-political battering rams by which Frankfurt School disciples such as the ACLU are forcing Americans to submit to and to obey the will and the way of the Left. These devious devices are but psychological versions of Georg Lukacs and Laventi Beria’s ‘cultural terrorism’ tactics. In the words of Beria,

“Obedience is the result of force…Force is the antithesis of humanizing actions. It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness, lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display an inhuman attitude toward people to be granted by those people the possessions of force.” (The Russian Manual on Psychopolitics: Obedience, by Laventi Beria, head of Soviet Secret Police and Stalin’s right-hand man)

Double-thinking ‘fence-sitters’, otherwise known as moderates, centrists, and RINOs bear the imprint of these psychological ‘obedience’ techniques. These people-in some cases literally afraid of incurring the wrath of name-calling obedience trainers— have opted to straddle the fence lest they be found guilty of possessing an opinion, one way or another. At the merest hint of displeasure from the obedience-trainers, up goes the yellow flag of surrender upon which it is boldly written:

“I believe in nothing and am tolerant of everything!”
Cultural Determinism

The linchpin of Cultural Marxism is cultural determinism, the parent of identity politics and group solidarity. In its turn, cultural determinism was birthed by the Darwinian idea that man is but a soulless animal and therefore his identity is determined by for example, his skin color or his sexual and/or erotic preferences. This proposition rejects the concepts of the human spirit, individuality, free will, and morally informed conscience (paired with personal accountability and responsibility) because it emphatically denies the existence of the God of the Bible.

Consequently, and by extension, it also rejects the first principles of our liberty enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. These are our “unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Cultural Marxism must reject these because these principles of liberty “are endowed by our Creator,” who made man in His image.

Cultural determinism, states David Horowitz, is

“identity politics-the politics of radical feminism, queer revolution, and Afro-centrism-which is the basis of academic multiculturalism…a form of intellectual fascism and, insofar as it has any politics, of political fascism as well.” (Mussolini and Neo-Fascist Tribalism: Up from Multiculturalism, by David Horowitz, Jan. 1998)

It is said that courage is the first of the virtues because without it fear will paralyze man, thus keeping him from acting upon his moral convictions and speaking truth. Thus bringing about a general state of paralyzing fear, apathy, and submission-the chains of tyranny-is the purpose behind psychopolitical cultural terrorism, for the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda must, at all costs, be clothed in darkness.

The antidote is courage and the light of truth. If we are to win this cultural war and reclaim and rebuild America so our children and their children’s children can live in a ‘Shining City on the Hill’ where liberty, families, opportunity, free markets, and decency flourish, we must muster the courage to fearlessly expose the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda to the Light of Truth. Truth and the courage to speak it will set us free.

Additional References

Slouching Toward Gomorrah, by Robert H. Bork

Intellectual Morons, by Daniel J. Flynn

Related Articles

Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2: Communist Progressive Democrats

Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left